Er, I am still confused about the prior point you made, and now I am also confused by your “can’t discard…” argument. There is a mathematical description of particles, which involves the sum of their paths. Yet, an axiom is not the mathematical description of a particle. An example of an axiom: “Parallel lines meet at the infinite horizon.” A mathematical system which includes that axiom is non-Euclidean. That axiom is not a particle, nor is it the mathematical description of a particle. The axiom is a relationship which is assumed to be true for that mathematical system. You can pick different assumptions, different axioms, to form different mathematical systems. Have I explained this well enough?

Written by

Easily distracted mathematician

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store